Home / Archive by category "Statements"


Media Statement:


05 September 2019

With sadness, women’s month has ended with a devastating heightened onslaught of violence against womxn in our country. As its people, we can no longer feint a reaction of shock to the horror that is the lived reality of women.

Like so many of you, the staff at the Centre have been triggered by the devastating loss of life and brutalisation of womxn’s bodies at the hands of men. We firmly believe that we live in a time when our constitutional rights must have meaning and where women should live lives free from all forms of violence, both in their private as well as public lives.

We live in a time when we can no longer accept mere condemnation of the torture and horror that womxn’s lives have become in our country. As the state works towards the development of a national strategic plan on violence against women, we demand that the plan be resourced and implemented. We cannot rely on reactionary solutions to what is a systemic challenge in our country and which requires multi-faceted approaches, political will and financial commitment.

Patriarchy is deeply embedded in our society and as womxn, we face the barriers and horrors that it places in our paths and the forms that it takes on a daily basis. We remind all women of our resilience in the face of discrimination and violence.

We remember that we stand in solidarity with those womxn who have come before us, and together our revolution for substantive equality continues. We draw inspiration and strength from the brave women who demanded action in 1956 and who in 2018 during the Total Shutdown called for action. As womxn we have never been silent and we will continue to demand that our voices are heard.

“Wathint’ abafazi wathint’ imbokodo

Women’s Legal Centre

For further enquiries, contact


Media Statement: Women’s Day 2019

Media Statement: Womxn’s Day


09 August 2019

The Women’s Legal Centre wishes all womxn a happy Womxn’s Day!

Women were only allowed to join the legal profession in South Africa in 1923, following the enactment of the Women’s Legal Practitioners Act of 1923.  The first black women lawyer, Desiree Finca, was admitted as an attorney in 1967, and she paved the way for young black womxn to enter the profession.  We pay tribute to womxn lawyers like Desiree Finca, Cissy Gool, Victoria Mxenge, Phyllis Naidoo, and others, who all practiced under the very dark days of apartheid under huge personal costs to their lives and freedom. Victoria Mxenge, a human rights lawyer and activist, was assassinated by apartheid security police for her human rights work.

Remembering the spirit of these womxm, Womxn’s Day this year is particularly special to the Women’s Legal Centre, as this year marks 20 years since the inception of the Centre. The Centre was established in 1999 to advance womxn’s rights in South Africa, and as an African feminist legal centre, our work remains essential in the struggle for equality and justice for womxn.

Womxn’s Day is celebrated to honour the resilience and strength of womxn, such as those mentioned above. It commemorates the Womxn’s March on 09 August 1956 where 20 000 womxn marched to the Union Buildings in Pretoria. They marched in protest of the carrying of pass books and against legislation by the apartheid government which aimed to control the movement of black womxn in urban areas. We honour those brave womxn who continue to be role models for us today.  We also remember the womxn who lost their lives during apartheid in the struggle for the freedom of our people.

As we celebrate the sheer strength and resilience of womxn in South Africa, we do so with bitter sweetness amid the backdrop of high rates of femicide, sexual and domestic violence against womxn, sexual harassment, a failure to recognize some womxn’s marriages, a denial of rights to sex workers, and so much more. We acknowledge that the strength of womxn is often a result and a means of survival from the realities which they endure. We acknowledge that the black, working class womxn is at the coalface of poverty and that her struggles are largely unrecognized by the State.

Despite these struggles, we celebrate womxn standing together. We celebrate womxn surviving. We celebrate the womxn in our sector who have shown a great amount of vigour, tenacity and fortitude in their work while tackling patriarchy, and pushing for gender equality and transformation. Despite the important progression toward formal inclusion, the realization of substantive gender parity in the legal sector has been and remains an enduring and arduous task.  Discriminatory practices like sexual harassment, gender pay gap, gender bias and patriarchal workplace structures are a major impediment to gender equality in the legal profession.

However, we celebrate our victories. With the advent of our democracy, we have seen many women entering the profession and taking judicial office in the Constitutional Court, Supreme Court of Appeal, and the High Courts for the first time.  We pay tribute to women lawyers like Yvonne Mokgora, Kate O Reagon, Mandisa Maya, Lucy Mailulu, Navi Pillay, Leona Theron and more.

We celebrate the womxn who we advise and represent, the womxn who, with the odds of an unjust system stacked against them, continue to endure. As we celebrate the strengths of being a womxn today, let us also remember that there is much to be achieved. We demand that the State recognize our constitutional rights and as true feminists, we ask womxn to stand together unified in the struggle against patriarchy and our demands for equality.

Happy Womxn’s Day.

For further details, contact Aisha on 021 424 5660 or 

Media Statement: Women’s Legal Centre wins in the WOZA women in law Awards

Media Statement: Women’s Legal Centre wins in the WOZA women in law Awards

06 June 2019

The WOZA awards is a new initiative started in 2019 by a group of women lawyers with the purpose of recognizing and empowering women in law for their contributions and growth in the legal sector.

The Women’s Legal Centre received two nominations by external parties in this regard. The first was in the category of “ best law firm with 5 or less women lawyers”, and the second was a nomination for WLC Director Seehaam Samaai in the category of the “Pinnacle award”, which recognises an outstanding leader in the legal sector above all other individual categories.

We are honoured to have received these nominations and thank those who submitted nominations and deemed us worthy. The WOZA awards were held at the Hilton Hotel in Sandton on Saturday 3 August, and 3 staff members from the WLC attended. We are happy to announce that we won the category for “best law firm with 5 or less women lawyers”! The WLC was the only public interest law firm nominated in any of the law firm categories.

We reaffirm our purpose of serving the needs of the most vulnerable women in society, and the need for the services of the WLC. In light of our 20th anniversary, we take this opportunity to thank those who have stood alongside us and supported us, and continue to support us. We also thank and acknowledge the organisers of the WOZA awards for the successful execution of the first WOZA awards, and wish them success for the future of the initiative.

For further details, contact Aisha on 021 424 5660 or 

WLC supports the “Stop Koffi Olomide campaign” and calls for denial of entry and cancellation of Koffi Olomide shows

18 June 2019
STATEMENT: WLC supports the “Stop Koffi Olomide campaign” and calls for denial of entry and cancellation of Koffi Olomide shows

Koffi Olomide, a Congolese musician and convicted rapist and harasser, is set to perform two shows in South Africa at the end of June, in Johannesburg and Cape Town.

Mr Olomide has a long history of sexual and physical violence against women. In March 2019, Mr Olomide was convicted of statutory rape in France. In 2016, he was deported from Kenya after a case of assault. In 2012, he was also accused of assaulting a journalist in Zambia. When such facts are clear and have been tested in a court of law, it is unacceptable to allow such a person into our country, and to perform on a public platform.

Continue Reading






28 May 2018

In April, the Women’s Legal Centre undertook to representing Professor Kil, one of the complainants of sexual harassment carried out by Muhammad Desai, the National Director of Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions South Africa (BDS SA).  Yesterday, we received the report which detailed the outcome of an investigation, carried out by BDS South Africa. We note with great disappointment the outcome of our client’s complaint of sexual harassment against Mohammed Desai.

Our client, along with two other women, lodged complaints with the Board of BDS SA against Mr. Desai on 22 March 2019, following incidents of sexual harassment on the 21st March 2019 in Johannesburg, Gauteng. On 3 April 2019, the Board of BDS-SA announced that an independent investigation would be convened on 15 April and that it would be completed within a period of one month.

Throughout April, and up until 16 May, the Women’s Legal Centre wrote to the Board of BDS SA to seek clarity on the terms of reference for the investigation. The purpose for which we sought the information was to enable the complainant to understand and make informed decisions about their participation in the process of the investigation. The WLC received no response to, or acknowledgement of, any of the concerns raised.

Without advising us, our client was approached for the first time on 20 May 2019 via email by the investigator of her complaint. She was also advised that the investigation was taking place urgently, and was asked to confirm the content of her statements. No new or further questions were posed to her and she was not given the option of interview.

On 27 May 2019, she was advised via her attorneys at the Women’s Legal Centre that the investigation had been completed and that the findings were that no disciplinary steps need to be taken against Mr. Desai as his behaviour did not constitute workplace misconduct.

We are disappointed in the legal findings, but we are even more disappointed with its analysis. It shows a clear bias in favour of the perpetrator, and the investigator places the burden and onus on women to address sexual harassment and sternly resist it. He opts to require that victims of sexual harassment make it clear by verbally informing the perpetrator and others that the behaviour is unwanted and unacceptable. We refer to the following excerpts of the report, which BDS SA has indicated published on their website:

  1. 85: “It is not clear why Prof Kil, a consummate Palestinian activist, who has encountered Mackivists before in the USA and in her activism community could not sternly inform Mr Desai to refrain and desist from what she considered to be an inappropriate predatory sexual behaviour.”
  2. 88: “According to the statements of Prof X, Ms Y and Prof Z[1], Prof Kil told them that Mr Desai was “annoying her, he could not leave her alone and he was bothering her”. Why did Prof Kil not tell other complainants or any persons at the restaurant that she was being sexually harassed?”

These types of analyses, among others included in the report, are extremely harmful to victims of sexual harassment, and present a bias in favour of male perpetrators. It is a regressive approach to dealing with sexual harassment, contrary to how our courts have interpreted laws in relation to sexual harassment.  To focus on the fact that because the client did not indicate that she is verbally uncomfortable makes her statements weak, is a poor analysis of the incident.

This investigation and its report are a case in point of the importance of taking a victim centred approach to dealing with sexual harassment.  The report favoured an approach that heavily criticised as well as questioned the motives and the behaviour of the complainant against the standard of the ‘perfect victim’, implying and creating a narrative in many instances that the victims are over-reacting, or seeking attention, which has damaging effects for the victim in the already distressing aftermath of seeking justice, and failing. In doing so, the report deliberately ignores the deeply entrenched and gendered power relations that exist between men and women in the workplace, as well as work-related social spaces, but ironically utilises an approach that is wholly indicative thereof.

It also ignores the case law on how sexual harassment can take place outside of the office space and that it frequently takes place in work-related social spaces.

It is disappointing that in the age where women’s voices are meant to be heard, and in light of the many cases of sexual harassment in the public sector in the last two years, at a time where strides are meant to be made to ensure women feel safe enough to come forward in sexual harassment processes, that this report will be used as a regressive justification for letting men get away with sexual violence, and the impact it will have on women coming forward in future.

We pledge solidarity with all the victims of sexual harassment at BDS South Africa, and in the public sector, those who have come forward, and those who have not. We will continue to assist our client as she considers her options going forward.

[1] Names redacted.

Issued on behalf of the Women’s Legal Centre

For further enquiries contact Aisha Hamdulay at or

Media statement: Update in respect of the Recognition of Muslim Marriages Case (Women’s Legal Centre v The President and Others):

MEDIA STATEMENT: Update in respect of the Recognition of Muslim Marriages Case (Women’s Legal Centre v The President and Others):

24 May 2019

On 9 May 2019, a full bench of the High Court in the Western Cape granted leave to appeal, and leave to cross-appeal their judgment in the Recognition of Muslim marriages case. The judgment and order, handed down in August 2018, held that the State has a duty to recognise marriages concluded in terms of Shari’a law, and that the State has an obligation to enact legislation which will ensure the judgement becomes a part of recognized law. The legislation, however, is only required to be formally legislated in two years, which leaves women vulnerable in the interim.

In October 2018, the President and the Minister of Justice applied for leave to appeal against the whole judgement. Leave to appeal was subsequently granted, and it was decided that the matter will be taken to the Supreme Court of Appeal.

The Women’s Legal Centre applied for leave to cross-appeal against the judgement in October 2018, which was granted on 9 May 2019.  Our reasons for cross appealing were that we were dissatisfied with the following parts of the judgment:

  1. We believe that the Court should have granted interim relief to women who are currently in a position where they require legal recognition of their marriages, so that their rights to housing, land and property are protected until legislation in enacted. The judgment did not provide women with any remedy while they awaited the two-year period for the state to develop and adopt legislation recognising their marriages.
  2. We believe that the Court erred in finding that Islamic marriages are currently “out of community of property” in South Africa when we know that people have different ways in which they deal with marital property within their marriage, and at the dissolution thereof, This is an issue best left to the legislature, and not the courts, to determine.
  3. Our cross-appeal is also driven by our belief that the Court erred in finding that there was widespread objection to legislative regulation and a lack of consensus in this respect in the Muslim community in South Africa. This was an irrelevant finding to the relief sought, and there was simply not enough evidence before Court to draw this conclusion. Even where there is possible objection, such objections cannot override the state’s constitutional duty.
  4. Further, the Court erred in not compelling the Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development to put in place policy or regulatory measures in terms of the Intestate Succession Act, to deal with the administration of estates which come from Muslim marriages at the office of the Master of the High Court. We led evidence showing that there was enough case law to justify putting in place such regulatory /policy measures.
  5. The Court further erred in failing to find that there is an obligation on the Minister of Justice to put in place measures that promote and protect Muslim women’s access to rights already given by prior judgments of the Courts, in respect of the consequences of Muslim marriages, particularly in respect of intestate succession.

We are confident that the case and the issues faced by Muslim women will be addressed by the Supreme Court of Appeal in ensuring that the principles of our Constitution are upheld. At the same time, we are mindful that women continue to face a violation of their rights, as well as discrimination on a daily basis because of the lack of recognition of their marriages. We continue to consult a number of women every day who face these and other kinds of injustices, which drives our further litigation and urgency on this matter, highlighting the need and importance of feminist litigation. Women in South Africa are entitled to equal recognition and protection of their Constitutional rights, regardless of race, gender, religion, economic status or other.

For further enquiries, contact Aisha Hamdulay at or

Media Statement: Workers Day

01 MAY 2019

Since its inception, a key objective of the Women’s Legal Centre has been advocating for the rights and protection of vulnerable women in the workplace. There is much to be said about the current struggles of women and work in South Africa, where we find that unequal gender and power relations lead to the marginalization and vulnerability of women, and socio-economic drivers continue to leave black women in the most vulnerable position in society. We still find gender disparities in terms of employment where women only occupy 1 in 3 managerial positions and even fewer senior positions. Furthermore, the women who do occupy managerial and senior positions are still largely white.

Black women make up a large part of the poor and working class, locked into cycles of poverty. They are bound to casual labour where they are paid the least but work the longest hours. For women, casualization of labour impacts on their rights to organize, on their family life, as well as their vulnerability to sexual violence in the workplace. We recognize the impact of intersectionality on women’s work experiences, and acknowledge the struggles faced by all vulnerable workers including farm workers, migrants and domestic workers, lesbian, bisexual and transgender women, and women from both rural and urban areas. This includes unfair discrimination; emotional, verbal and physical abuse; manipulation by employers; sexual harassment and more.  On this workers day, we acknowledge that while our Constitution addresses worker’s rights, the realization of these rights on the ground are often not sufficiently met and implemented. There is still much to be done in terms of achieving substantive equality with regards to women’s rights in the workplace.

On this note, we call for rights to be applied equally to all workers and for women to be protected in their workplaces. We call for the decriminalization of sex work, in order for sex work to be recognized legally as work. We acknowledge the struggles of sex workers, who are majority women, including the abuse faced by both clients and police, and the restrictions they face in accessing their given rights, and accessing justice because of the criminalization of their work choices.

In the workplace, women are still left at a disadvantage, unprotected and vulnerable. The high levels of sexual harassment that occurs in the workplace is symptomatic of toxic patriarchal cultures which must be addressed. It is unacceptable that women do not feel safe and protected in their workplaces. On this workers day, we recognize the victims of sexual harassment and abuse which stems from such cultures in the workplace – those sitting in both silence as well as those who have chosen to speak out.

We recognize that women have unique struggles in the workplace. We recognize the important role that African feminist litigation plays in advancing the rights of women in the workplace, and working towards eradicating those struggles. We pledge to continue using this to fight for women to have equal rights in the workplace. We call on government, the private sector and all employers to take a feminist approach in their laws, policies and processes to ensure that women are sufficiently protected in the workplace.

For further enquiries, contact Aisha Hamdulay at or

Media Statement: Human Rights Day: Looking Back, Moving Forward 21 March 2019


Equality is one of the substantive rights enshrined in our Constitution, which is praised for being one of the most progressive constitutions in the world in terms of socio-economic and human rights. It was a struggle for equality which ignited the Sharpeville protests 59 years ago, of which we remember, and honour, the 69 protestors who were killed in the Sharpeville massacre. The right to Equality provides that no person may be unfairly discriminated against based on sex, race, gender, sexual orientation etc. Today, 59 years after this incident, and over 20 years into our democracy, despite a progressive and comprehensive constitution which should protect us, this sense of equality is still not felt. Many people face grave violations of their rights, especially womxn, who face significant amounts of violence, abuse and discrimination on a daily basis. Additionally, while there has been progress in the legal system with regard to womxn’s rights, there are still major problems with womxn’s access to legal services. It is these dynamics which informed the very formation of the Women’s Legal Centre 20 years ago.

Continue Reading

Media Statement: Stop the Silencing of Womxn Victims 18 March 2019


On 13 March 2019, Gugu Ncube staged a one-womxn protest outside the Union Buildings in Pretoria. Ncube’s placard read:

“President Ramaphosa: 1) The police are used to intimidate, threaten and harass me. 2) I was raped, sexually harassed by Shibambu Mhlava at UNISA. 3) I spoke out, they lied that I had resigned. #Produce my resignation. 4)CCMA Commissioner took bribe from the perpetrator. “

This was in response to alleged sexual harassment and rape suffered at the hands of her employer while working for Unisa Centre for Early Childhood Education, as well as additional threats and intimidation she faced from SAPS. While protesting semi-naked outside the Union Buildings, Gugu was arrested by SAPS on the basis of public indecency. In videos circulating online, the undignified and unnecessarily violent way in which SAPS treated Ncube can be seen.

Continue Reading

Public Statement: Women Who Testified in the Equal Education Enquiry on Sexual Harassment Speak

Public Statement

Women Who Testified in the Equal Education Enquiry on Sexual Harassment Speak

We are some of the 19 women who submitted our confidential testimonies to the Equal Education enquiry on Sexual Harassment. We read Judge Satchwell’s report with densely felt disappointment. We had hoped, that based on the promises of the new leadership of Equal Education, and the moment we live in today, that this time around our stories would be heard. Our stories are all different, but together they paint a coherent and strongly corroborated picture of a pattern of behaviour at Equal Education: Sexual harassment, intimidation, bullying, cover-ups, and threats. While we draw strength from the #MeToo movement, we are acutely aware of the failures of formal legal processes and inquiries to side with women against powerful, protected men. 

Continue Reading